Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Cowden Support Program (CSP) - minimizing microbial regrowth


QUESTION:

I am currently taking the Cowden protocol for lyme disease.  Is treatment necessary after the six months or will the lyme disease be cured?

DR COWDEN's ANSWER:

The Cowden Support Program produced by Nutramedix helps the body to eliminate many of the microbes that contribute to symptoms of Lyme disease, and helps to lower toxic load and improve the internal environment of the body, thus making microbial regrowth less likely.  I know of no “CURE” for Lyme disease.  The best goal in treatment of Lyme disease is to detox the body, eliminate a large number of microbes, nutritionally support the body and allow the immune system to get back in control over the remaining microbes.


Find out more about alternative health practices from leading world renowned practitioners at www.ACIMConnect.com.  Ask questions of leading practitioners and patients live and in person in June in Dallas and in October in Florida at the public sessions.  

http://www.acimconnect.com/home/tabid/41/ctl/viewdetail/mid/2174/itemid/33/d/20130622/Overcoming-the-Diagnosis---PUBLIC-SEMINAR---Dallas%2c-TX.aspx

Monday, May 20, 2013

Tell me about raw milk...


QUESTION:
Ok - so tell me about raw milk.  
Here's what I've found after a relatively brief search: 
1) It tastes waaay better.
2) If you get it from a known/reputable farm, your chances of bacterial contamination drop significantly - though not as low as if the milk is pasteurized.
3) Pasteurization does remove some nutritional value, though the evidence doesn't seem to indicate much.
4) Supporters claim significant health benefits - which may exist, though none are scientifically validated (evidence at present is anecdotal and so could be attributable to other factors or nonexistent)
5) If you get a contaminated batch of milk/butter/cheese, it's pretty serious (like kidney-failure/hospitalization serious), not just a case of the runs.  
6) Cost is very high - like $10/gallon
So from this, it appears to me that there are probably slight benefits (like no hormones, better nutrition), and very significant risks (significant not in terms of "you'll almost definitely get sick" but "if you do get sick, it's not minor").  Is this accurate?  What studies are there that support the "raw milk is awesome" side?  
Thanks!

Dr. Cowden’s ANSWER:
Milk is one of the most commonly allergenic foods, resulting in inflammation & immune disruption throughout the body when consumed by people with allergy to milk. People with blood type B are the only ones who do fairly well drinking milk or consuming other dairy products (all other blood types get clumping of their blood cells in the arterioles & capillaries after consuming milk products, which impairs oxygen delivery to the tissues & forces anaerobic metabolism with resultant lactic acidosis).  I know of no benefits of consuming most raw (or pasteurized) milk products other than prevention of starvation in the impoverished.  Most vegetables are a better source of utilizable calcium than dairy products. Gouda cheese does provide vitamin K, but fermented soy provides more vitamin K per ounce.  Milk (pasteurized worse than raw) is one of the most mucoid-producing of all foods. The mucoid material clogs lymph vessels, makes respiratory secretions thicker & stickier (allowing microbes to grow in those secretions more easily), impairs gastro-intestinal absorption of nutrients & predisposes to intestinal dysbiosis (even if there are no antibiotics in the milk).  

Find out more about alternative health practices from leading world renowned practitioners at www.ACIMConnect.com.  Ask questions of leading practitioners and patients live and in person in June in Dallas and in October in Florida at the public sessions.  http://www.acimconnect.com/home/tabid/41/ctl/viewdetail/mid/2174/itemid/33/d/20130622/Overcoming-the-Diagnosis---PUBLIC-SEMINAR---Dallas%2c-TX.aspx